PLEASE SHARE THE DAILY SCOPES OR GIVE THEM A GOOGLE PLUS 1
MONDAY NIGHT 10PM EST PRAYER SESSION http://www.youtube.com/c/mrsmoreful/live
8pm Est Wed new moon Taurus 1 hour

♈ ARIES
You don’t take no for an answer and it can work. I do see you getting what you want this week by sticking to your guns. I do see a great week with career or with business; you could benefit through others with this energy. This a great time for recognition and praise for your work at school or in career. I do see things slowly turn around for some of you so just be a bit more patient. Or focus more on the things in life that bring you peace and happiness.

♉TAURUS

You are following your own drummer this week. For some of you , you are nontraditional with your career path, and you have more freedom or a…

By knot of one oh serpent come,
By knot of two the spell to do,
By knot of three I conjure thee,
By knot of four ‘tis through the door,
By knot of five the spell to thrive,
By knot of six the spell to fix;
By knot of seven now I have ‘em!
By knot of eight ’tis sealed by fate,
By knot of nine the spell I bind.”

Gemma Gary
Traditional Witchcraft: a Cornish Book of Ways

April 21, 2017 (Julian 111)

Yesterday I forgot to address something important.  April 20th is the anniversary of Adolph Hitler’s birth in 1889.  Few historical figures can generate the kinds of reactions that Hitler can.  In keeping with my basic idea that astrology is not about “fate” but about “tendencies” and “opportunities” and “windows,” I would like to take a moment to make a few points from my vantage point.

1. At least a few people have argued that Hitler was “created” by circumstances, especially the harsh treatment of Germany after World War I.  (I first heard this idea promulgated in a history class.)  The idea is simple: if Germany had not been treated so harshly, then the economic climate would not have been ripe for the rise to power of a dictator like Hitler.  (Maybe Ernst Rohm?  Would a gay Sagittarius Nazi have been as bad as…

A clever bit of detective work by US scholars and scientists has proven that one of the jewels of the University of Chicago’s manuscript collection is, in fact, a skilled late 19th- or early 20th-century forgery.